There's no fix formula on this, it all depend on your app.
you need to collect performance data then evaluate the needs whether it's
hardware bottleneck or software issues.
next, based on my experience. for IIS - you need CPU power, ram size (depend
on app), SQL - the more memory you can dump in the better
--
Regards,
Bernard Cheah
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tryiis.com/" target="_blank">http://www.tryiis.com/</a>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://support.microsoft.com/" target="_blank">http://support.microsoft.com/</a>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.msmvps.com/bernard/" target="_blank">http://www.msmvps.com/bernard/</a>
"Flip" <[remove_me]phenry_w@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23ko22ZpGFHA.2504@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>I am lucky enough to be the proud owner of an previously loved P3 350Mhz,
>dual Xeon processor with 1GB of RAM and six SCSI RAID 9GB HDs. Would this
>server class box be better served as an IIS server or as a SQL Server
>machine?
>
> I'm currently running IIS on an 800Mhz with 256MB and a 40GB HD. And my
> current SQLServer box (doing double duty as a mail server too) is a P3
> 650Mhz with 192MB and a 10GB HD.
>
> Any suggestions? I'm considering taking the RAM out of the server box and
> putting it into my SQL Server box, but I'm not sure if that would be the
> best use of the hardware.
>
> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: new server class hardware, better for IIS or SQL Server?