Rocky wrote:
>
> I am guessing that using hieght and width to resize images is not good
> practise, but what exactly _is_ the problem with doing it that way?
>
resizing smaller:
o Browsers are not very good at it.
o Larger file size means longer download
resizing bigger
o Never works
Assuming one has used a fluid design for the page it is trivial to replace
one illustrative image with another even if they are slightly different
sizes/aspects - surrounding text will re-flow to suit the new object. Note:
this may cause some 'jumping' as the page loads and for this reason leaving
out width and height is a no-no for some designers.
Possible solutions include:
o Ignore the issue - optionally buy more transfer allocation and leave your
visitors staring at an empty hole while they wait.
o Replace your co-workers with staff already competent in the mysterious
arts of image manipulation
o Train your co-workers to the required standard
o Use a server side module/component to resize the images.
o Stop using images.
--
William Tasso - <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://WilliamTasso.com" target="_blank">http://WilliamTasso.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: improper use of width and hieght?