|
Related Topics:
| i have a probleme with cpanel - i am webmaster of a site when i was to login to the control panel i recieve this message Invalid License File what is the probleme
Small cpanel error... - When Tina warned us to look in WHM and upgrade cpanel I did but now I have one customer who cant access her wevb mail.. when she logs into cpanel and clicks check web mail it gives her a 404 error... anyone ever have this problem before and know how to..
Why Can't I Access My Ipowerweb CPanel?? - Every now and then I can't access my site's cpanel from various Their support said something about firewalls and opening port 8080 and some other port. I don't know much about etc. Is there a way to the problem to..
IE password problem in cpanel - A client cannot access webmail or member area with username password Two servers, 1. UnixBSD No control panel with password username access works fine in both IE6 and NS 7.1 2. Linux Cpanel with password username access does not..
red hat/cpanel/cron help needed... Please? - Ok I have a few sites that all need cron to run to There was so many running at tone time it would crash the server... A friend told me to try this.. login as root and in cron put */20 * * * * ..
|
|
|
Next: Webmaster: My "Really sad day" thread
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Post subject: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc.
Archived from groups: alt>www>webmaster (more info?)
|
|
|
We have a RAQ550 and want to upgrade it to something better since they are
EOL and still bug riddled. We only host about 20 domains with about 900
email addresses but growing as a small ISP.
Question, which is best? I am leaning towards Plesk since it has a RAQ550
import abillity. I want a solution that allows end email users the abillity
to login and setup there own junk mail rules. I also need webmail access.
I also want antivirus but think I can add that with CLamAV somehow like we
did on the RAQ.
Any suggestions?
Matt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: May 19, 2004
Posts: 154
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:05 pm
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt" <nospam.hciss.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10cna25f8587ba7@corp.supernews.com...
> We have a RAQ550 and want to upgrade it to something better since they are
> EOL and still bug riddled. We only host about 20 domains with about 900
> email addresses but growing as a small ISP.
>
> Question, which is best? I am leaning towards Plesk since it has a RAQ550
> import abillity. I want a solution that allows end email users the
abillity
> to login and setup there own junk mail rules. I also need webmail access.
> I also want antivirus but think I can add that with CLamAV somehow like we
> did on the RAQ.
> Any suggestions?
>
> Matt
>
>
>
cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
Easy WHM full control over your domains.
Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
and on...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:15 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
>
> and on...
It would be nice if they could configure SPAM filter options in the webmail
and have a SPAM folder thats not downloaded with POP3.
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 19, 2004
Posts: 154
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 1:15 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt" <nospam.hciss RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10cnhl3l1b0odad@corp.supernews.com...
> > cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> > Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> > xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> > Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> > Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
> >
> > and on...
>
> It would be nice if they could configure SPAM filter options in the
webmail
> and have a SPAM folder thats not downloaded with POP3.
>
> Matt
>
>
Yes...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 04, 2003
Posts: 149
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 2:38 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Matt wrote:
>> cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
>> Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
>> xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
>> Easy WHM full control over your domains.
>> Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
>>
>> and on...
>
> It would be nice if they could configure SPAM filter options in the
> webmail and have a SPAM folder thats not downloaded with POP3.
>
> Matt
--
If you turn spamassassian on and tell it to place the spam in "spam" folder
it will only be downloaded via horde...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:10 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
Cpanel online demo has been down for months. Apparentlly they are not
working to hard to get new users. They offer a 30 day trial copy or
something like that but spending a day setting up a Linux box and installing
Cpanel seems like a lot of work just to see what it looks like.
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 19, 2004
Posts: 154
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:10 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt" <nospam.hciss.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10cnrtnkjdlg25f@corp.supernews.com...
> > cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> > Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> > xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> > Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> > Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
>
> Cpanel online demo has been down for months. Apparentlly they are not
> working to hard to get new users. They offer a 30 day trial copy or
> something like that but spending a day setting up a Linux box and
installing
> Cpanel seems like a lot of work just to see what it looks like.
>
> Matt
>
>
Email my Support Team if you want.
They'll set you up a demo to poke at if you want to take a look.
Besides, cpanel's demo is old version.
support.DeleteThis@themooseisloose.net
Allis sent you.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 2384
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Matt wrote:
> We have a RAQ550 and want to upgrade it to something better since they
> are EOL and still bug riddled. We only host about 20 domains with
> about 900 email addresses but growing as a small ISP.
>
> Question, which is best? I am leaning towards Plesk since it has a
> RAQ550 import abillity. I want a solution that allows end email users
> the abillity to login and setup there own junk mail rules. I also
> need webmail access. I also want antivirus but think I can add that
> with CLamAV somehow like we did on the RAQ.
> Any suggestions?
Of the ones you mention, I have only used Cpanel and Ensim.
I found Cpanel much better. Cleaner, more intuitive, everything you
need, everything works.
Rapidly becoming the norm now. Familiar for users.
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">http://CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 31, 2004
Posts: 314
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Charles Sweeney" <me RemoveThis @charlessweeney.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95071686FEE2Dmecharlessweeneycom@130.133.1.4...
> Matt wrote:
>
> > We have a RAQ550 and want to upgrade it to something better since they
> > are EOL and still bug riddled. We only host about 20 domains with
> > about 900 email addresses but growing as a small ISP.
> >
> > Question, which is best? I am leaning towards Plesk since it has a
> > RAQ550 import abillity. I want a solution that allows end email users
> > the abillity to login and setup there own junk mail rules. I also
> > need webmail access. I also want antivirus but think I can add that
> > with CLamAV somehow like we did on the RAQ.
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Of the ones you mention, I have only used Cpanel and Ensim.
>
> I found Cpanel much better. Cleaner, more intuitive, everything you
> need, everything works.
>
> Rapidly becoming the norm now. Familiar for users.
Experience with both as well. Cpanel, definitely...far superior.
--Tina
--
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.AffordableHOST.com" target="_blank">http://www.AffordableHOST.com</a> - since 1997
Managed, Dedicated & Colo Servers
Cpanel multi-domain hosting starts @ $5.95/mo.
20% discount code: newsgroup<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 27, 2004
Posts: 204
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
: "Charles Sweeney" wrote:
: > Of the ones you mention, I have only used Cpanel and Ensim.
: >
: > I found Cpanel much better. Cleaner, more intuitive, everything you
: > need, everything works.
: >
: > Rapidly becoming the norm now. Familiar for users.
:
Tina added:
: Experience with both as well. Cpanel, definitely...far superior.
Interesting. I've only used Plesk, so I can't compare, but I've heard people
say that CPanel is less stable and that Plesk is better in their opinion.
I'm happy with Plesk. 
Lois >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> Experience with both as well. Cpanel, definitely...far superior.
Naturally Cpanel is the only one without RAQ import ability. The other 2 do
have RAQ import capability.
Anyone know how to move everything out of a RAQ550 into CPanel? Anyone do
it for a fee?
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 31, 2004
Posts: 314
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 4:12 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Lois" <auto-newsgroups.DeleteThis@wordsweave.com> wrote in message
news:jYOyc.259$Hp2.184@fe39.usenetserver.com...
> : "Charles Sweeney" wrote:
> : > Of the ones you mention, I have only used Cpanel and Ensim.
> : >
> : > I found Cpanel much better. Cleaner, more intuitive, everything you
> : > need, everything works.
> : >
> : > Rapidly becoming the norm now. Familiar for users.
> :
> Tina added:
> : Experience with both as well. Cpanel, definitely...far superior.
>
> Interesting. I've only used Plesk, so I can't compare, but I've heard
people
> say that CPanel is less stable
We have around 50 Cpanel servers and they are all stable. We've had one
minor incident, months ago, that was directly related to a Cpanel upgrade.
The only thing you don't want to do is leave auto-upgrade enabled...don't
let Cpanel automatically install upgrades. Like any software release, you
want to wait until you're sure the new release is relatively bug-free.
--Tina
--
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.AffordableHOST.com" target="_blank">http://www.AffordableHOST.com</a> - since 1997
Managed, Dedicated & Colo Servers
Cpanel multi-domain hosting starts @ $5.95/mo.
20% discount code: newsgroup<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 31, 2004
Posts: 314
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:20 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt" <nospam.hciss.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10cnrtnkjdlg25f@corp.supernews.com...
> > cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> > Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> > xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> > Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> > Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
>
> Cpanel online demo has been down for months. Apparentlly they are not
> working to hard to get new users. They offer a 30 day trial copy or
> something like that but spending a day setting up a Linux box and
installing
> Cpanel seems like a lot of work just to see what it looks like.
>
> Matt
Cpanel makes so much money, they don't need to work too hard on getting new
customers. 
I'll have an empty Cpanel server you can play around with for a few, in
about a week. We are taking back one of our dedicated servers (...long
story), but have given the customer until the 25th to get his files moved.
You can poke around on it after we're finished wiping it. Email me, if
you're interested.
--Tina
--
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.AffordableHOST.com" target="_blank">http://www.AffordableHOST.com</a> - since 1997
Managed, Dedicated & Colo Servers
Cpanel multi-domain hosting starts @ $5.95/mo.
20% discount code: newsgroup<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 29, 2004
Posts: 1010
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2004 9:19 pm
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Matt" <nospam.hciss.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:10cnhl3l1b0odad@corp.supernews.com...
> > cPanel. User friendly. Easy, easy, and...easy.
> > Domain owners have access to full email options, spam controls..etc.
> > xscanner and mailscanner do the virii scanning.
> > Easy WHM full control over your domains.
> > Webmail with 3 GUI options and IMAP Support.
> >
> > and on...
>
> It would be nice if they could configure SPAM filter options in the webmail
> and have a SPAM folder thats not downloaded with POP3.
>
If you are talking about cpanel it does.
Also the spam folder is only downloaded if you use IMAP. Pop leaves it alone<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 07, 2004
Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2004 1:24 am
Post subject: Re: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
> If you turn spamassassian on and tell it to place the spam in "spam"
folder
> it will only be downloaded via horde...
Can it be setup to automatically empty old messages out of the Spam folder
when it gets to large?
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: cPanel vs. Plesk, Ensim, etc. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
