Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the ..

Getting on unwanted lists or blacklists is something everybody fears.
It was something common, and applied to people, writers in the USA
by the government just a few decades ago. Writers were blacklisted
for political writings. So, anyway we all fear those things when they
happen to our lives, and they shouldn't happen really.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

But when it does happen, by a megalomaniacal psychopath online
running psychopathic missions and creates a website about you and
so on, or when you find yourself in unomfortable situation because
some software doesn't respect your privacy and builds a profile
on your intimate conversations which cannot be removed by
the arrogant psycho online company, and there is no law,
only in California there is one called the anti-phishing which
requires the removal of personal materials upon request from
ALL webpages (services not excluded), then you are up to your
own challenge to dispute your private material, especially with
a company that draws top nazi news coverage, so forget your privacy,
one finds himself running a human right battle, which psychopaths
enjoy Abu Graibing. The dumb gets power over the educated in
such criminal conditions. Never mind.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

So the question becomes: What to do with unwanted psychopathing
net profilers and human rights violators?

My answer always turns to the FTC, but since this is a problem
which effects everybody, or let's say every intelligent person,
there is a way to stop Google from violating human rights by building
unwelcome profiles on people. 90 percent of people online recognize
the need to keep privacy and they don't use their own names and emails.
I was stupid to be naive that I can remain using my name and fell into
an trap of abuses, and, as a human being, I solved this privacy dilemma
effecting all people online, caused by vicious marketers like
yourselves here,
and a simple complaint to the FTC can solve this problem. www.ftc.gov
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

One would expect that if anyone, it would be web marketers who would
understand this. I understand that you would also be the first one to
turn
away, but you should also be responsible about this problem, unlike
google.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

Sorry. Its merely one of the greatest spamming annoyances what
google does with privacy online, especially on usenet. Please.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

Ok, let's try over. I guess the Internet primarily is a place of
commercial,
educational, government and private websites.

Some form of commercial conduct violate privacy and are called
spam. Now you can report Google for spam to the FTC, because
for example it archives commercially private information and presents
as profiles which is illegal if the content is private. Really. Its
illegal,
so they spam on usenet, the way they arrange the data on people.
So people have to hide, using iconic or I don't know how you call
it ids and false emails. This is not acceptable, because people who
turn to the Internet, newcomers, would use their own names, and their
privacy is violated by spam. (Just a change of approach, I hope you
can understand me.)
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

When the government builds profiles on people, people are outraged.
When companies build profiles on people, they call it marketing
data acquisition and warehousing, and its valuable information
for targeted or searchable marketing, and companies have terrabytes
of data on people, their shopping habits, religion, income, club
memberships, anything they can use to selectively target customers
with higher potential for meeting offer and personal interests. But
they
do it in the background. Usenet was a place of email gathring for spam,
so people used no_spam as email for a long time. Now email providers
have spam filters which really works. So what I was saying is that
Google
profiles customers, by topic I guess. They check repetitive words and
detect topic by very complex software technologies, and google ads
targeted
sponsor links to the topic, which they are so good in deteting by
software.
That's all they care, bringing sponsors together with a fully indexed
usenet
browser, that's all, but they don't care about anything else, including
isues of organizing people's private-interest discusions or intimate
interests,
and building profiles on things likes people's names and emails. They
don't care,
but they should, really. Because why... I have explained it above:
simple privacy
invasion, people don't like to be listed and profiled. They really
don't. So there
is a simple 'spam' by a corporation molesting people's privacy by
targeted
ads to their private profiles which google created. Its really a
psychotic molestation
of the global population of humanity and mankind on this planet.
Super-psychotic
molestation corresponding to crimes against humanity and with at least
a five-
year jail sentence to Larry Page and Sergey Bring, the founders of
google,
and a possible year-or-two sentence for Dr. Eric Schmidt, CEO of
google, past CEO of
Novell I think for crimes against humanity, which can be avoided by
having spam
stopped by the FTC, but if that does not occur, then crimes against
humanity
procedures need to be considered in the future of the human society.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

Please.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

So the queshchion iz: Can all this be solved technologically as Kofi
Annan proposed, or should there be a human rights intervenchion?

The answer, iz: what it iz, sugar?
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

Its hard to solve it, but it easily dissolves in water.

now take the water, and tell it: I can see you, sugar.

we don't really see it, especially not in a cup half full,
I mean half empty. yet if we think a lot, there is a way
to reconstruct the sugar cube.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

So anyway, according to Kofi Annan, we need technology to
de-profile Google profiles, like anti-spam technology for spam emails.

Well I studied the technology, and Google cannot provide such features,
they might, but, I guess they have to, because others cannot do it
but google. And google is set up in a way, not to exclude a singe byte
ever, or like Scientology, no changes are allowed to their final
Groups Beta, which they announced will forever remaing Beta.
No more changes.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

And maybe I am supposed to use technology against my psycho stalker
who built web pages against me, so I am supposed to block his psycho
web page intended to destroy my life with my software technologies.

I think this is a line, where Kofi Annan has failed at, Because if we
cannot
use technology and technological institutions to block psychoware,
then we are forced to turn outside of the technological domain, and
seek external intervention. Now google believes that they are not
responsibl for anything, that anything that happens is not their
problem,
as they don't mediate between people's problems on the Internet.
You know. Their product is perfect, competent, and exemplary.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the .. 

There is no technological solution to block profiling with Groups Beta.
Why? Because other people may have contributed to the Google-generated
profile, and Google can only address messages for removal which are
posted by self. This is a lawyer argument. In reality,
marketing-related
corporate profiling of personal information is very sensitive and
people
usually complain about such marketing practices. Now this is a special
case, as nobody complains about Google for its marketing peculiarities.
Because people cannot deal with complex issues involving spam. There
are Ph.D specialities in this area. Google pulled such a complex task
with their violations, which only the highly educated is capable of
carrying
it as a discussion, and the highly intelligent thinks little of google
(see prior
message) rather than much to do anything about the hidden google
faggots
of human molestations.
 >> Stay informed about: Solving crime of the century: Psychopathic slavery on the ..