|
Next: Anyone really DO 24/7 phone support?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Dec 20, 2003
Posts: 87
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:57 am
Post subject: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring
Archived from groups: alt>www>webmaster (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 571
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:40 am
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:02 GMT, TechnoHippie <technohippie RemoveThis @toast.net>
wrote:
> By George, I think she's got it! Take a look again at the ring hub.
> This is the first time I've ever gotten the includes right and made
> something blend in so well. Thank you for pushing my buttons 
Woo! You might want to lighten the blue, or darken the text and links;
it's kind of hard to read in some places, especially on the lists in the
Statistics section. Otherwise, looking very slick
Anytime you need me to push your buttons, just ask 
Grey
--
The technical axiom that nothing is impossible sinisterly implies the
pitfall corollory that nothing is ridiculous.
- <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.greywyvern.com" target="_blank">http://www.greywyvern.com</a> - Orca RingMaker: PHP web ring creation and
management<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 1662
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:49 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"TechnoHippie" <technohippie.DeleteThis@toast.net> wrote in message
news:405956ff$1@news03.toast.net...
> By George, I think she's got it!
 )
"I could have danced all night"!!
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">www.CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 3499
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:01 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Charles Sweeney wrote:
> "TechnoHippie" <technohippie.TakeThisOut@toast.net> wrote in message
> news:405956ff$1@news03.toast.net...
>
>> By George, I think she's got it!
>
>> o)
>
> "I could have danced all night"!!
<q> ...
And done a thousand things
I'd never ever done before
....</q>
--
William Tasso<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 1662
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:14 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"William Tasso" <SpamBlocked RemoveThis @tbdata.com> wrote in message
news:c3brv5$262cu9$1@ID-139074.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Charles Sweeney wrote:
> > "TechnoHippie" <technohippie RemoveThis @toast.net> wrote in message
> > news:405956ff$1@news03.toast.net...
> >
> >> By George, I think she's got it!
> >
> >> o)
> >
> > "I could have danced all night"!!
>
> <q> ...
> And done a thousand things
> I'd never ever done before
> ...</q>
We might have something here.
You could play Professor 'iggins, Ms Jude could play Elisa, and I could play
her Father.
I think Ms Jude's cockney accent could be quite entertaining. Come to think
of it, so could mine!
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">www.CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 3499
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:38 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Charles Sweeney wrote:
> "William Tasso" <SpamBlocked.RemoveThis@tbdata.com> wrote in message
> news:c3brv5$262cu9$1@ID-139074.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> Charles Sweeney wrote:
>>> "TechnoHippie" <technohippie.RemoveThis@toast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:405956ff$1@news03.toast.net...
>>>
>>>> By George, I think she's got it!
>>>
>>>> o)
>>>
>>> "I could have danced all night"!!
>>
>> <q> ...
>> And done a thousand things
>> I'd never ever done before
>> ...</q>
>
> We might have something here.
>
> You could play Professor 'iggins, Ms Jude could play Elisa, and I
> could play her Father.
>
> I think Ms Jude's cockney accent could be quite entertaining. Come
> to think of it, so could mine!
yipeeee - A talent contest
aww idol [1] is born ;o)
[1] get me outta here.
--
William Tasso<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 12, 2004
Posts: 123
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:04 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
While sitting in a puddle TechnoHippie scribbled in the mud:
> By George, I think she's got it! Take a look again at the ring hub.
I think you have a IE6 bug.
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz</a>
--
Duende<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 1662
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:07 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Duende" <xxxspam RemoveThis @wipkip.us> wrote in message
news:Xns94B07AD2E31B5xxxspamwipkipbiz@130.133.1.4...
> While sitting in a puddle TechnoHippie scribbled in the mud:
>
> > By George, I think she's got it! Take a look again at the ring hub.
>
> I think you have a IE6 bug.
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz</font" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz</font</a>>
I got that too earlier, IE6, when hitting the back button. But subsequent
retries were ok.
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">www.CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 20, 2003
Posts: 87
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:28 am
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Charles Sweeney wrote:
>>I think you have a IE6 bug.
>>http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz
>
>
> I got that too earlier, IE6, when hitting the back button. But subsequent
> retries were ok.
I get that alot on other sites rendering php ... so it's got to be the
includes. Usually, if I can scroll then reverse scroll, it's all the
way it should be. And I use Moz, not IE.
--
Judy
alt.www.webmaster alumni webring
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.technohippie.com/scripts/ringmaker.php" target="_blank">http://www.technohippie.com/scripts/ringmaker.php</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 1662
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:36 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"TechnoHippie" <technohippie DeleteThis @toast.net> wrote in message
news:405aaffa$1@news03.toast.net...
> Charles Sweeney wrote:
>
> >>I think you have a IE6 bug.
> >>http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz
> >
> >
> > I got that too earlier, IE6, when hitting the back button. But
subsequent
> > retries were ok.
>
> I get that alot on other sites rendering php ... so it's got to be the
> includes. Usually, if I can scroll then reverse scroll, it's all the
> way it should be. And I use Moz, not IE.
Just thinking out loud here...Are the includes include() or require()?
Don't know if it would make any difference.
To paraphrase my understanding of it, includes are conditional, requires are
mandatory.
I got the page fine, first hit, it was only hitting "back" that gave me the
blank page. Does the page call the script again when hitting "back" or may
we be looking at a caching issue?
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">www.CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 12, 2004
Posts: 123
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:28 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
While sitting in a puddle Charles Sweeney scribbled in the mud:
> "TechnoHippie" <technohippie.DeleteThis@toast.net> wrote in message
> news:405aaffa$1@news03.toast.net...
>> Charles Sweeney wrote:
>>
>> >>I think you have a IE6 bug.
>> >>http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz
>> >
>> >
>> > I got that too earlier, IE6, when hitting the back button. But
> subsequent
>> > retries were ok.
>>
>> I get that alot on other sites rendering php ... so it's got to be
>> the includes. Usually, if I can scroll then reverse scroll, it's all
>> the way it should be. And I use Moz, not IE.
>
> Just thinking out loud here...Are the includes include() or require()?
>
> Don't know if it would make any difference.
>
> To paraphrase my understanding of it, includes are conditional,
> requires are mandatory.
>
> I got the page fine, first hit, it was only hitting "back" that gave
> me the blank page. Does the page call the script again when hitting
> "back" or may we be looking at a caching issue?
In IE it worsk fine at 600x800 but not so good above above that.
--
Duende<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 20, 2003
Posts: 87
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:27 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Charles Sweeney wrote:
> "TechnoHippie" <technohippie.RemoveThis@toast.net> wrote in message
> news:405aaffa$1@news03.toast.net...
>
>>Charles Sweeney wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>I think you have a IE6 bug.
>>>>http://tinyurl.com/2yyoz
>>>
>>>
>>>I got that too earlier, IE6, when hitting the back button. But
>
> subsequent
>
>>>retries were ok.
>>
>>I get that alot on other sites rendering php ... so it's got to be the
>>includes. Usually, if I can scroll then reverse scroll, it's all the
>>way it should be. And I use Moz, not IE.
>
>
> Just thinking out loud here...Are the includes include() or require()?
It's a .php file. It's a morph of my site template (html and css) and
Grey's script (php and css). Now that you mention it, I'm going to
recheck how I did that and rethink the meta-content tag. Shouldn't a
true php file be enclosed in php tags without the meta or with a
different one? But, to answer your mindecho, it's includes. If William
or Grey would look at the source they might be able to tell me if I
goofed up. I think I did. I tried creating an shtml file of my
template and using the include tag in the body. I don't remember if it
didn't work or if I didn't like it.
>
> Don't know if it would make any difference.
>
> To paraphrase my understanding of it, includes are conditional, requires are
> mandatory.
>
> I got the page fine, first hit, it was only hitting "back" that gave me the
> blank page. Does the page call the script again when hitting "back" or may
> we be looking at a caching issue?
???
--
Judy
alt.www.webmaster alumni webring
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.technohippie.com/scripts/ringmaker.php" target="_blank">http://www.technohippie.com/scripts/ringmaker.php</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 28, 2003
Posts: 1662
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:42 pm
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Duende" <xxxspam.TakeThisOut@wipkip.us> wrote in message
news:Xns94B16061CD33xxxspamwipkipbiz@130.133.1.4...
> In IE it worsk fine at 600x800 but not so good above above that.
Interesting. I only saw it in 1024x768
--
Charles Sweeney
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.CharlesSweeney.com" target="_blank">www.CharlesSweeney.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 12, 2004
Posts: 123
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:02 am
Post subject: Re: [PING] GreyWyvern re Webring [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
