|
Related Topics:
| CSS min-width for IE? - Hi guys. I want to use on a new site to prevent the being ruined in a window smaller than 640px across. body { 640px; } Works great in Opera, as all good things do, but has no effect in IE 6. Anybody know of a work..
Page Width - Is there any way of setting the page width to account for all I ask this because my cancer website is utilized by people that may, or may not, have visual These people may have their computers set up to give them the highest..
improper use of width and hieght? - Sometimes staff on my site send me html reports for and I have noticed that they use width and hieght to resize large images so they appear as This isn't something I do, if I need I create and link them to..
Text to span column width? - Hi, is it possible to size a line of text to span from one side of a column to the other? Does that make sense? Thanks - Joe
Layout Check please - Hi all. I designed this site a long time ago before learning about css etc. Are there any layout issues with certain browsers? I will change it to css if there is and maybe even if there isn't. LOL. Here is the testing page:..
|
|
|
Next: Webmaster: Right...That's it.....I give up.....
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Apr 28, 2004
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:06 am
Post subject: Layout width
Archived from groups: alt>www>webmaster (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Nov 07, 2003
Posts: 321
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:06 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Quoth the raven named Ciaron Nixon:
> What width do all you people design to these days?
> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
No width. No screen size, either.
Design for Any Size:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?AnySizeDesign" target="_blank">http://allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?AnySizeDesign</a>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?Tableless_layouts" target="_blank">http://www.allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?Tableless_layouts</a>
The Myth of 800x600:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=2684/nam1012432092/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.ddj.com/documents/s=2684/nam1012432092/index.html</a>
How Can I Make My Pages Look Good On All Monitors?
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.thepattysite.com/window_sizes1.cfm" target="_blank">http://www.thepattysite.com/window_sizes1.cfm</a>
--
-bts
-This space intentionally left blank.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 07, 2004
Posts: 80
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:06 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon.DeleteThis@strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> What width do all you people design to these days?
> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
I design for 1600x1280.
You should, too! Its the newest craze!
-Karl<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 03, 2004
Posts: 221
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:33 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon DeleteThis @strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> What width do all you people design to these days?
> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
100%
--
Sam.
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.doohickeys.co.uk" target="_blank">www.doohickeys.co.uk</a>
for desirable devices
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.669 / Virus Database: 431 - Release Date: 26/04/2004<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:58 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Fat Sam" <janetandsam.DeleteThis@btbroadband.com> wrote in message
news:c6pbih$dtmsb$1@ID-227183.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon.DeleteThis@strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > What width do all you people design to these days?
> > I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
>
> 100%
I've used 100% for many years, but lately I've been trying out setting
max-width:40em (or 45, or 50), and liked the results. Ignored by IE, of
course. Opinions?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 14, 2004
Posts: 1625
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 9:36 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:16:15 -0400 "Karl Groves"
<karl DeleteThis @NOSPAMkarlcore.com> broke off from drinking a cup of tea at
CompuServe Interactive Services to write:
>
>"Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon DeleteThis @strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
>news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> What width do all you people design to these days?
>> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
>
>I design for 1600x1280.
>You should, too! Its the newest craze!
....since all the viagra spam started arrving....
Matt<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 193
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:41 am
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon.DeleteThis@strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> What width do all you people design to these days?
> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
Depends on the clients needs, most recent was for 800 pixels across, which
will work on all resolutions greater and be ok on smaller resolutions, there
are problems with every approach, from a designer / developer / usability /
accessibility point of view...
HTH's
Gerry<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 23, 2004
Posts: 151
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Ciaron Nixon wrote:
> What width do all you people design to these days?
> I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
>
> cheers,
> -ciaron
>
>
100%/scalable whenever possible.
Judy
--
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.technohippie.com/html" target="_blank">http://www.technohippie.com/html</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: 569
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Karl Groves karl.RemoveThis@NOSPAMkarlcore.com wrote:
>
> "Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon.RemoveThis@strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
> news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > What width do all you people design to these days?
> > I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
>
> I design for 1600x1280.
> You should, too! Its the newest craze!
>
hah! I spit on your puny 1600x1200...I turn my monitor on it's side and
design for 1200x1600
--
eric
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ericjarvis.co.uk" target="_blank">www.ericjarvis.co.uk</a>
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: 569
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Layout width [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
C A Upsdell cupsdell0311XXX@- wrote:
> "Fat Sam" <janetandsam DeleteThis @btbroadband.com> wrote in message
> news:c6pbih$dtmsb$1@ID-227183.news.uni-berlin.de...
> >
> > "Ciaron Nixon" <ciaron.nixon DeleteThis @strath.ac.uk> wrote in message
> > news:c6p9tk$elhbc$1@ID-230982.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > > What width do all you people design to these days?
> > > I don't mean screen size, i mean actual width.
> >
> > 100%
>
> I've used 100% for many years, but lately I've been trying out setting
> max-width:40em (or 45, or 50), and liked the results. Ignored by IE, of
> course. Opinions?
>
I do it if there's a lot of important body text, though I've been setting
60em...maybe I should bring that down a tad...though so far it only helps
those of use using a sensible browser
--
eric
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ericjarvis.co.uk" target="_blank">www.ericjarvis.co.uk</a>
"live fast, die only if strictly necessary"<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Layout width |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
