 |
|
|
|
Next: Secure LDAP on windows?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 03, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:56 pm
Post subject: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro?
Archived from groups: alt>apache>configuration (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Nov 03, 2003
Posts: 2907
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 03, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Acorn Tutors" <info.TakeThisOut@acorntutors.com> wrote in message
news:Bqm5b.9150$Sq5.252124@news20.bellglobal.com...
> Hi folks, I was wondering if Apache is better than IIS. In addition, a
book
> I have recommends installing MySQL first, then Apache and then PHP. Is
this
> an order you recommend?
>
> TIA,
> Doug
>
You can only run one website on IIS in xp pro.
If you need to run more you need to use apache.
hth<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 04, 2003
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2003 9:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:56:50 -0400, Acorn Tutors wrote:
> Hi folks, I was wondering if Apache is better than IIS. In addition, a book
> I have recommends installing MySQL first, then Apache and then PHP. Is this
I'd follow that advice. Unless you need ASP/.NET (as someone previously
mentioned) APache is very good, very easy to configure has a lot of
available modules and info, (heck many independent whole sites dedicated to
it.)
IMO it's very good, but again, for what? SOme apps *require* IIS.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 04, 2003
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 03, 2003
Posts: 2907
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 12:45 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 04, 2003
Posts: 8
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2003 9:33 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 09:35:32 +0200, Johan Louwers wrote:
>>IMO it's very good, but again, for what? SOme apps *require* IIS.
>
> Like what?
> There is always something you can get that will do the same thing on a
> Apache machine.... 
I'll let you know, I just bought a server I need to set up for a customer
and it requires IIS. I have never allowd IIS to be installed on any of opur
machines but I may have to for the customer. Come to think of it he may
already have it installed.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2003
Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2003 9:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Acorn Tutors" <info.RemoveThis@acorntutors.com> wrote in
news:Bqm5b.9150$Sq5.252124@news20.bellglobal.com:
> Hi folks, I was wondering if Apache is better than IIS.
Responding to GET manually is better than IIS. IIS is insecure, buggy,
slow, and expensive. Apache is secure, mostly bug free (nothing is
perfect), fast, and free.
--
Rossz
Remove 'NOSPAM' from my email address to reply directly<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Apache is better than IIS for Win XP Pro? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | apache 'n' xml-rpc - hi I would want to know as he configure Xml-Rpc server on apache.
Apache and php - I have just innstalled Mandrake 9.1, Apache2 and php 4.3.0. I have added a line in httpd.conf - "AddType application/x-hhtpd-php .php3". The line is in the end of the config-file. Would this be enough to get php to work? I can't read php-files...
Apache::ASP - Has anybody used apache::ASP? On what platforms is it implemented? Is it working with COM components?
Apache 2 + PHP - Hello, are there still any issues about using Apache 2 with PHP? Is there a compatibility list somewhere around? Thanks, Florian -- Abkürzung unbekannt? ++ http://www.xgm.de +++
Best Practices - Apache 2.0.47 + SSL + W2K - Hi, I've posted previously about compile problems with Apache 2.0.47 on W2K. I've got those issues resolved now, and can compile Apache with SSL (mod_ssl.so) support. My question is, do you have any recommendations on "best practices" for set... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
