IIS 5 Design: NLB vs MS Cluster Services

Thanks Doug... that was all that I would want to know

Andres

 >-----Original Message-----
 >Microsoft does not recommend using IIS and the cluster
 >service. Use NLB instead...
 >
 >http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=248025
 >
 >
  >>-----Original Message-----
  >>Hi everybody, I'm in the process of redesign a customer
  >>DMZ architecture, they plan to have two servers like
the
  >>wewb front end pieces, I would like to provide
tolerance
  >>and scalability, can somebody ilustrate me in which
 >cases
  >>is better implement a NLB instead of cluster solucion
  >>using MS services with a share drive ?
  >>Can be MS clsuter services active/active with IIS ?
  >>Any ideas I really apreciate
  >>
  >>Andres M
  >>.
  >>
 >.
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: IIS 5 Design: NLB vs MS Cluster Services 

I can second that. We cluster IIS with a shared drive, and regret it
whenever we have to do maintenance or update content. Its doable, but it
would have been much better to use NLB in hindsight.

We just clustered it in the first place because we wanted to see if it would
work (problem with giving geeks the keys to the car....)


"Andres Martinez" <andres_martinez DeleteThis @newat.com> wrote in message
news:5ae801c3e5d2$c557bbe0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
 > Hi everybody, I'm in the process of redesign a customer
 > DMZ architecture, they plan to have two servers like the
 > wewb front end pieces, I would like to provide tolerance
 > and scalability, can somebody ilustrate me in which cases
 > is better implement a NLB instead of cluster solucion
 > using MS services with a share drive ?
 > Can be MS clsuter services active/active with IIS ?
 > Any ideas I really apreciate
 >
 > Andres M<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: IIS 5 Design: NLB vs MS Cluster Services